| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. PvE vs PvP .... Why? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bootleg Jack wrote: First, you improve PvP to draw from the millions of PvPers world wide. 1. Ignore the carebears, they make lousy PvPers, have to be either bribed and/or protected... Your vision of the game is so narrow and blind there's...
- by the plague - at 2012.07.30 03:28:00
|
2. PvE vs PvP .... Why? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I absolutely agree with the OP on this. While it obviously would be impossible to truly mimic the intricacies of PvP combat in EVE's PvE content, that should be the goal. Are the "solve" the missions? Sure, but the missions should still encourage ...
- by the plague - at 2012.07.29 17:53:00
|
3. We need *Real* Eve Mysteries - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP has done an admirable job of reducing the magnificence and mysteries of the cosmos to the bunch of boring rocks. Imagine what EVE would be like if you really did face the unknown out there... But too many prefer Team Fortress in space for that...
- by the plague - at 2012.07.23 01:31:00
|
4. CCP: How is the Supercap change coming along? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is the natural extension of the mindset that insists every single aspect of EVE Online has to be dumbed down to rock-paper-scissors in a misguided effort to "balance" combat. The end result is a bunch of ships that do one thing and nothing el...
- by the plague - at 2012.07.23 01:05:00
|
5. Whatever happened to the new Bounty System? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ranka Mei wrote: Which is why the entire bounty system is inherently flawed. Problem is, the matter is equally inherently unsolvable . There's no way CCP could prevent you from having an alt kill yourself; and even if they could, you can alwa...
- by the plague - at 2011.11.04 03:23:00
|
6. should there be a counter to blobs? is the end game more ships = win? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
In my opinion you're looking at the problem from the wrong angle because blobs are only a symptom of a much larger problem. Of course it ought to be very, very difficult for a small force to defeat a larger, better equipped force. Common sense dic...
- by the plague - at 2011.10.15 20:17:00
|
7. CSM Update: Second Meeting with CCP Zulu on Friday 09-16 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CSM Update 1: A meeting with CCP representatives took place today. We can't reveal the results of the meeting or even what was talked about, but there's cause for optimism since a follow up meeting has been scheduled. An update on that will follo...
- by the plague - at 2011.09.17 13:53:00
|
8. CSM meets CCP Senior Producer Zulu about your concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Unfortunately, Meissa, most of the goodwill toward EVE has been used up by CCP's delaying tactics, ridiculous overuse of the NDA, and general failure to actually listen to anyone about anything. And it bears mentioning that there's a big differenc...
- by the plague - at 2011.09.14 16:19:00
|
9. CSM meets CCP Senior Producer Zulu about your concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Azelor Delaria wrote: Meissa Anunthiel wrote: I'm informing you of a process in place, not of CCP saying "we'll look at it somewhere down the line". One process that should generate progress or at least an answer because they're looking at i...
- by the plague - at 2011.09.12 21:25:00
|
10. WTS Awesome 109 MSP Character from 2003! - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
You do realize he's required by the forum rules to divulge that he's not the original owner of the character, right? It's part of the rules for character sales here in the Bazaar. All that means is that the character was traded here in the Bazaar ...
- by the plague - at 2011.09.12 01:00:00
|
11. End the practice of NDA's for the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Swooshie wrote: NDA sucks, having the playerbase representatives under gag sucks. But removing the private shield behind which the Cie. can do preliminary work (albeit sometimes bad work) would be a sure way to insure this community would go in...
- by the plague - at 2011.09.12 00:52:00
|
12. End the practice of NDA's for the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Headerman wrote: Yes well no body is perfect are they Well that's true enough. Perhaps I'm just expecting too much of CCP. And way too much from the CSM. I guess I should be thankful if they merely succeed in not making the game any wors...
- by the plague - at 2011.09.12 00:44:00
|
13. End the practice of NDA's for the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Headerman wrote: The CSM are members of a committee, there to represent the interests of the player base. 1) You have to trust them to do their job 2) As a committee their input and authority is pretty limited. That's not going to change. CC...
- by the plague - at 2011.09.12 00:27:00
|
14. End the practice of NDA's for the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Headerman wrote: I hate to be so blunt but... NDA'd CSM minutes are a small thing. Agreed. But then no one mentioned CSM minutes, did they? What we're talking about here is, well, pretty much everything else the CSM being involved with bein...
- by the plague - at 2011.09.12 00:19:00
|
15. End the practice of NDA's for the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Two step wrote: As we all have said a thousand times, we asked CCP to make the contents of the meeting public. They declined to do so. CCP comes to us with all sorts of ideas. Some of them are very cool, some are very stupid. If every stupid i...
- by the plague - at 2011.09.12 00:18:00
|
16. End the practice of NDA's for the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: GǪso you'd prefer that the CSM just have to take CCP's word for it whenever they say they're working on something, rather than being shown that they are, indeed, working on something?. So you're not prepared to take CCP's wo...
- by the plague - at 2011.09.11 17:28:00
|
17. End the practice of NDA's for the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Mittani wrote: It's also funny that there are idiots who think that the CSM has any choice as to what is NDA'd and what isn't; if it was up to us, we'd tell you what the meeting was about. But in this case it's Zulu's decision. vOv I ge...
- by the plague - at 2011.09.10 23:33:00
|
18. CSM Leader Mittani not having a clue - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: the plague on 11/08/2011 15:47:55 @Meissa Your vision of improving 0.0 and making it a viable home for industrialists is a worthy goal and a goal I think many of us share. However, I honestly believe you're choosing to overlook the...
- by the plague - at 2011.08.11 15:46:00
|
19. Your voices have been heard. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Windjammer There are a lot of critics of the CSM in this thread and maybe some of that is justified criticism, but thereÆs room to believe theyÆll do better this trip. Sure they got treated like chumps last time, but thatÆs ...
- by the plague - at 2011.06.28 17:17:00
|
20. Your voices have been heard. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: White Tree If this is just a simple PR move then yeah, we're going to be equally upset but I maintain hope that it isn't. That's my job broseph, to keep hope alive. I'm sorry, White Tree, but I see no logical reason to g...
- by the plague - at 2011.06.28 14:43:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |